← NS-INRS / DCRP51 · Wave–Pseudo-Eikonal Rigidity and the Null-Hessian Survivor Cone

NS-INRS · DCRP51 Restriction 2026-08

DCRP51: Wave–Pseudo-Eikonal Rigidity and the Null-Hessian Survivor Cone

Building on the central perfect-response system DCRP50 reduced to — q_zz=Δ_hq, |∇_hq|^2-3/2(q_z-4a)^2=12(a'+a-2a^2) — and using DCRP41/DCRP44's unique periodic gauge-flat eigenmode and the full-wave-cone/vorticity-realizability frontier of X72 Round43, this round asks whether the wave–pseudo-eikonal system forces q to be affine. The answer does not hold unconditionally, but carries strong signed rigidity: using a Lorentzian Bochner identity and an exact Hessian factorization, it proves that on any connected block where the right-hand side C(s)=12M_a(s) satisfied by the shifted scalar u=q-4a(s)z is non-positive, u must be spatially affine. Combining this with the infeasibility results of DCRP41/DCRP50 shows that M_a(s) cannot be negative for a persistent survivor, yielding a sharp periodic amplitude window 0≤a(s)≤1/2, with every genuinely non-affine point necessarily lying on the rank-one null-Hessian characteristic cone D^2u=κℓ⊗ℓ (ℓ a null vector). STOP-D51 explicitly does not claim general wave–pseudo-eikonal affine rigidity — it only establishes that the active periodic branch is confined to this logistic amplitude band and that non-affine points are constrained to the null-Hessian cone — left to DCRP52 to impose Hessian integrability/Codazzi conditions on D^2u=κℓ⊗ℓ, test whether ℓ must be constant, and connect to the X72 vorticity-stress algebraic cone.

This round's status: Restriction — Taken from the file's own Executive result / STOP node, meaning preserved, not a full verbatim translation. The original paper itself was authored directly in English; only this page's own commentary (title, status, and summary) is translated here.

Connections

Relationship to the rest of the series, stated as closely as possible in the document's own words, not my interpretation.

Loading…