NS_GSM Proof Authority Review v0.4

The first time a specific, hand-selected set of candidates (limited to ETN-X, DCRP103/104/105, and 3 RFP papers — not the full 1,726-candidate pool) is pushed through a full audit of source hash, statement, scope, hypotheses, and certificates. 20 audit targets, result: 13 promotions (12 PROOF_ASSET + 1 OBSTRUCTION), capped at AUDIT authority; 4 reconfirmations of already-native objects; 3 deferred. Concretely promoted: DCRP103’s five bounded local tensor-algebra lemmas (D103.1–D103.5), DCRP105’s four bounded lemmas (D105.1–D105.4), and three of RFP’s four theorems (RFP-05 Thm 32.1, RFP-10 Thm 42.1, RFP-12 Thm 12.1) plus one promoted as an obstruction (RFP-12 Thm 19.1); RFP-10 Thm 39.1 is explicitly deferred because its preconditions (formation completeness, finite forcing coverage) are not yet established. ETN-X’s C1 and C2 remain explicitly marked DEFER, ‘still an open proof obligation.’

13 narrowly-scoped local lemmas/theorems are promoted to AUDIT-level proof assets; C1 and C2 remain explicitly marked as open proof obligations. The report, verbatim: ‘This version does not independently prove the audited mathematical content. Source-internal results are capped at AUDIT authority unless there is an explicit, VALID independent verification result.’ Firewall: a source’s own theorem label ≠ a source-internal proof asset ≠ independently-verified proof authority ≠ parent-problem theorem closure.

Connections

Relationship to the other versions, stated as closely as possible in the document's own words, not my interpretation.

Previousv0.3 · Candidate Review and Promotion

Nextv0.5 · Independent Verification

NS-GSM progressv0.4 (8 versions total: seed dataset + v0.1–v0.7)

Methodological basisCSM Paper 09 · NS_GSM Canonical Domain Model

Loading…