← NS-DCRP / DCRP-26 · SGS Recurrence Gap and Dual-Work Coercivity NO-GO
Proves that the energy/enstrophy work pairing cannot itself be coercive (rigid-transport tangent vectors are exactly work-orthogonal), replaces dual-work coercivity with an exact SGS-energy recurrence argument, and identifies the remaining global branch as critical-reservoir/compactness escape rather than an unresolved stress-angle kernel.
Relationship to the rest of the series, stated as closely as possible in the document's own words, not my interpretation.
Loading…