← Lebesgue Universal Covering Problem / Round 34 · RHCert Origin

Lebesgue Universal Covering Problem Round 34 · RHCert Origin Neo.K / Aletheia

Rational-Hull Certificates Become Independently Replayable for the First Time, No New Geometric Progress This Round: RHCERT-v0.1 Doubles Publication Candidates to 4/77

Round 34 (AMRAL-LUC-FC-R34, 2026-09-20) establishes the origin of the term "RHCert"/"RHCERT" that carries through into later documents in this research line, including Round 37: RHCert is short for Rational-Hull CERTificate, taken directly from this round's custom binary format's magic header, "L34RHC01" ("RHC" = Rational-Hull-Certificate), and from this round's own document wording; it is entirely about the Lebesgue Universal Covering Problem, and the letters "RH" are purely a two-letter coincidence overlapping with "Riemann Hypothesis" — with no other connection to it whatsoever. This is precisely the question that was already raised during this programme's internal review, and it is clarified explicitly and directly here. Mechanically, an RHCert is a compact binary file that, for every terminal leaf node of a given cell's witness tree, stores the exact rational-number vertex coordinates of the inscribed polygon used to prove that the leaf's area exceeds the target threshold — coordinates aligned to a fixed grid (integer X, Y, with x=X/10¹⁸, y=Y/10¹⁸), accompanied by a ".rhidx" random-access index file — so that a second, independent verifier can check the underlying geometric proof directly from the stored numbers, without rerunning or trusting the original search code (the verifier performs none of candidate generation, the SciPy hull computation, or the emitter's pass/fail determination — it accepts only certificate bytes). This round concretely implements the "RHCERT-v0.1" binary format, re-emitting two already-qualified cells — cell47 (2,163,069 vertices, 9228/9228 leaves PASS, minimum margin 6.75024723×10⁻⁹) and cell48 (2,109,700 vertices, 9285/9285 leaves PASS, minimum margin 1.03164178×10⁻⁷, with membership/convexity/exact-area failures at 0 for both trees) — in this new, byte-level replayable form; after delta-varint plus DEFLATE compression, each vertex costs about 3.5–3.9 bytes, so the complete rational certificate for a tree of about 9000 leaves needs only about 8 MiB, showing that full certificate persistence is practically feasible. Direct result: the number of cells at the programme's highest evidence tier, "publication-candidate," doubles from 2/77 to 4/77 ({47,48,69,70}); with cell68 also completing 9255/9255 mpmath/libmp lower PASS this round and passing both the marker68 independent upper bound and the MPFR upper-bound cross-check to be promoted to ARITHMETICALLY-CLOSED-PROTOTYPE, the broader "arithmetic-closed-or-better" tier reaches 5/77 ({47,48,68,69,70}) — this comes purely from upgrading the "evidence format" for already-established results, not from any new geometric search; this round explicitly states that no new global common-depth geometry wave occurred, and the global counts remain unchanged at geometry-complete 66/77 and 51/77 at common depth d=36. Research direction is chosen and led by Neo.K; this round's execution was carried out by Aletheia / GPT-5.6 Sol.

Round 34 implements RHCERT-v0.1, a binary replayable rational-hull certificate format — RHCert stands for Rational-Hull CERTificate, unrelated to the Riemann Hypothesis — re-emitting cell47 and cell48 as concrete, byte-level replayable certificates. The publication-candidate tier thereby doubles from 2/77 to 4/77, and with cell68's separate promotion, the arithmetic-closed-or-better tier reaches 5/77. This is an evidence-format upgrade for already-established results — replacing existing PASS determinations with concrete rational-number certificate bytes that a second party can independently replay — not new geometric search progress; this round explicitly states that no new global geometry wave was performed, with geometry-complete remaining at 66/77 and those at common depth d=36 remaining at 51/77. The global bound a_Leb≥0.835 of the Lebesgue Universal Covering Problem remains unproven and is still an open problem.

Connections · Connections

Loading…