← CPL / 08 · The Toy P70 Minimal Boundary-Escape Frontier
The open-band toy knows only $S(1),S(2),S(3)$; this round adds one minimal piece of extra information, $\mathbb E[S(4)]\le B$, and re-solves for $p_{\min}(B)$, with the goal of finding $B^*_{70}=\sup\{B:p_{\min}(B)\ge0.70\}$. The continuous column-generation numerics give $B=3.67\Rightarrow69.9982\%$ and $B=3.65\Rightarrow70.0596\%$, bracketing $B^*_{70}$ between $3.65$ and $3.67$; linear interpolation yields an exploratory candidate $B^*_{70}\approx3.66941$ — the document explicitly flags that “this 3.66941 is not a theorem, only the target the next exact certificate should aim at.” The finding with real conceptual value is a comparison of scale: the open-band optimum's own boundary row is about $S(4)\approx3.73$, but pushing the floor from 69.82% past 70% does not require forcing the boundary row all the way down to the CUE value (i.e., 1) — it only requires ruling out the most extreme sliver of spike freedom. The information needed to break 70% is far less than fully knowing the boundary row. The document also supplies a concrete numerical dual candidate for the next certification target (after retaining a $5\times10^{-5}$ safety margin, the dual objective still comes to 70.0546%), paving the way for the exact certificate in the next round (09).
Relationship to other documents, stated as far as possible in the document's own words, not my interpretation.
“The information needed to break 70% ≪ fully knowing the boundary row. This is exactly what the concept of ‘minimal escape information’ is meant to measure.” — from this document's Section 2, “Why Does This Have Conceptual Value?”
Loading…