← CPL / 01 · Modular Reconstruction of the Proof Chain
Breaks the proof of Claude's paper into three independently trackable modules. Module Z (Zero Side): restricts the Weil Hermitian form to a finite-dimensional test family, then uses the functional equation to symmetrically decompose it into P⪰0 plus a hyperbolic block Q controlled by off-line pairs; adding the two gives the compression G̃=P+Q. Module L (Linear Algebra): Claude's Lemma 3.2 uses the von Neumann trace inequality to give a rank lower-bound inequality in terms of rank P≤r and n₊(Q)≤b, which takes a concrete form when c=2. Module P (Prime Side): uses the explicit formula to turn the traces of the compression into prime-power/archimedean integrals, unconditionally giving tr G̃~N and tr G̃²~(1/λ+λ/3)N, with λ≤1 as the key structural boundary. Together, the three modules give the baseline flat window value of 2/3 at λ=1; after optimising the window density in §7.1 (the Euler extremal problem yields v*_λ(s)=cos(√2λs)), this reaches c₁*=0.753296… at λ=1, corresponding to 67.25%. It also notes that the existing unconditional main proof really only uses low-order moments — if fourth moments were known, under the conditional HL*(4,λ) hypothesis this could reach 13/18≈72.22%, showing that P_70 has a very concrete conditional-moment route. The page closes with 5 Proof Obligations (PO-01 through PO-05) that each require independent re-verification, including the 0.68185 constant (PO-05), whose complete derivation has still not been located in the main text.
Relationship to other documents, stated as far as possible in the document's own words, not my interpretation.
“Claude uses CCLM17's one-delta extremal result to show that, when only the values of Montgomery's F(α) on [-1,1] are used and a §7.1-style window extremisation is maintained, the Montgomery–Taylor kernel is already extremal; hence this subframework cannot be pushed further simply by changing the window.” — from this document's “6. Window optimisation” section.
Loading…