← Phase 2 / 26 · Novelty Search Log

Phase 2 · 26 v0.4 · 26 2026-08-13

Novelty Search Log

Handles the novelty problem that Documents 18 and 20 have consistently marked as "another independent Gate". Exact searches ("696b1", "696.e1", exact Weierstrass equation, equation with BSD, with Fouquet-Wan) found no directly corresponding BSD quadratic-twist family on arXiv. Broad searches (non-semistable full BSD quadratic twist family, Fouquet-Wan quadratic twists BSD, arbitrary reduction BSD elliptic curve twist) found related results such as semistable/specifically named curve families, mod $p$ or mod square results, supersingular/full-BSD families, and the Banwait–Huang semistable algorithm cluster, but this round did not locate a clearly published theorem that directly lists or obviously contains this same positive-density prime family for 696.e1. The document boxes its core epistemological stance: NO HIT ≠ NOVELTY PROOF—failing to find it does not equal proving originality; these are two different things. Therefore, before formally claiming priority or a new theorem, the document lists four tasks still to be done: citation chain tracking on MathSciNet/zbMATH/Google Scholar; searching all papers citing Fouquet–Wan; asking a real number theorist referee to check if this is just a direct corollary of some general theorem; and checking the latest 2026 preprints.

Both exact and broad searches found no directly corresponding published results, but explicitly states NO HIT ≠ NOVELTY PROOF; four tasks remain to be completed before formally claiming originality. — The phased status self-reported by the documents in the package, reproduced as is.

Connections · Connections

Relationship with other documents, try to use the words from its own document, not my interpretation.

"NO HIT ≠ NOVELTY PROOF." — Excerpt from the "Correct epistemic status" paragraph in this document.

Loading...