← Method Lines of the Perfect Cuboid: FORC, GERES, SIO-X4, X4-DMSD, IGPC and TIFV / TIFV · trajectory-information freedom verification

Method Lines of the Perfect Cuboid: FORC, GERES, SIO-X4, X4-DMSD, IGPC and TIFV TIFV · trajectory-information freedom verification Author line in the source: Neo.K / EveMissLab

The Trajectory-Information Freedom Verification Methodology for the Perfect Cuboid (v0.2) and the Research Notes of This Round

v0.2: an expanded framework — a lifted configuration space, path functionals, holonomy H_γ, a common-lift proposition and a defect-correspondence conjecture; the Euler brick (44, 117, 240) is used only as a local-versus-global sanity check; Propositions A–C are 'research propositions, not yet proven theorems'. The research notes record two negative results (rotational closure and radius comparison have no discriminating power / reduce to Pythagoras), the shift from trajectory shape to transported information, and open questions A–E; nothing is proved.

A methodology draft and research notes (status 'Methodology Draft / Research Framework' and 'Research Notes / Non-proof'); the paper says that passing TIFV would not prove existence. Proposition B is conditional on a closure defined by TIFV itself (circular as a theorem, but it is not claimed as one). TIFV is dated (10-06 23:28 / 23:48) after R23 (10-06 17:00) but its §16 still names R12–R16 as the existing main lines. v0.1 is in the table below; the author line is 'Neo.K / EveMissLab' and there is no AI-role line.

Connections · Connections

This is a full-text translation of the Chinese source, which remains authoritative for its research claims. Translation is not independent mathematical verification and does not upgrade the original evidence level.

Loading…