← P/NP Dual Rehearsal / Research Rounds / Round 2
Team Not-Equal proposes its first candidate — the residual distinguishable load H_res: classify the residual functions of a SAT formula after a partial variable assignment by semantic equivalence; if some cut has many pairwise-distinguishable residual functions, then any system that summarizes what it has read using only finite state must have enough states — |Q_S|≥N_res(φ,S) is a genuine semantic lower bound. But Team Equal immediately points out that this holds only under a fixed variable order and a fixed-cut model — a general algorithm can reorder variables, revisit the input, use global algebraic summaries, or introduce auxiliary variables to escape. Establishes a six-part qualification test for candidate invariants, and uses the parity function PARITY (2^n candidates, yet only 1 bit of state is needed) to break the intuition that “a large candidate space requires exponential state.”
Relationship to other documents, stated as far as possible in the document's own words, not my interpretation.
“Team Not-Equal has won a local weapon, but not yet a cross-representation super-weapon. Team Equal has escaped successfully, but has not yet exhibited an actual polynomial existential-quantifier compressor.” — from the “Round Verdict” at the end of this paper. Score currently P=NP: 1, P≠NP: 1 (“the score is just a game interface, not mathematical evidence”).
Loading…