← P/NP Dual Rehearsal / Research Rounds / Round 2

Round 2 v1.0 2026-08-01

The Battle for a Cross-Representation Invariant: After the Existential Quantifier Collapses, What Must Still Remain?

Team Not-Equal proposes its first candidate — the residual distinguishable load H_res: classify the residual functions of a SAT formula after a partial variable assignment by semantic equivalence; if some cut has many pairwise-distinguishable residual functions, then any system that summarizes what it has read using only finite state must have enough states — |Q_S|≥N_res(φ,S) is a genuine semantic lower bound. But Team Equal immediately points out that this holds only under a fixed variable order and a fixed-cut model — a general algorithm can reorder variables, revisit the input, use global algebraic summaries, or introduce auxiliary variables to escape. Establishes a six-part qualification test for candidate invariants, and uses the parity function PARITY (2^n candidates, yet only 1 bit of state is needed) to break the intuition that “a large candidate space requires exponential state.”

Round 2 dual-hypothesis rehearsal — The package's self-described stage status, reproduced as-is. The original text's title uses “P/NP Debate Game Research Area,” which differs slightly from the “Dual-Proof Rehearsal Research Area” used in the other rounds; reproduced as-is without harmonizing.

Connections · Connections

Relationship to other documents, stated as far as possible in the document's own words, not my interpretation.

“Team Not-Equal has won a local weapon, but not yet a cross-representation super-weapon. Team Equal has escaped successfully, but has not yet exhibited an actual polynomial existential-quantifier compressor.” — from the “Round Verdict” at the end of this paper. Score currently P=NP: 1, P≠NP: 1 (“the score is just a game interface, not mathematical evidence”).

Loading…