RFP-11: Pathwise Coercive Actions, Dangerous-Core Filtering, and Dynamical Guard Coverage

Pathwise Coercive Actions, Dangerous-Core Filtering, and Dynamical Guard Coverage

RFP-10's main audit conclusion: certificate compactness does not equal dynamical coercivity — the nine per-edge tax boundary faces still cannot constitute finite obstruction. More importantly, RFP-10 finds that even bounded taxes can still escape internally via I-A (Σlog𝔗^adj_n=∫‖∇u‖_∞dt=∞, among others). This round introduces pathwise actions grounded in standard Navier–Stokes regularity theorems; combining the energy inequality with a mid-eigenvalue criterion, proves a mid-strain temporal-intermittency inference; integrates Miller's strain–vorticity perturbation action with Bradshaw–Grujic's frequency-window action into a dynamical-necessity filter; proves the ten-channel RFP frontier reduces to the intersection with a triple-divergent-action core.