← SRBRD: The Symmetric Root-Bounded Relation Domain and the Sieve–Parity Boundary
/
SRBRD-20 · The hypothesis audit and the minimal missing lemma
SRBRD: The Symmetric Root-Bounded Relation Domain and the Sieve–Parity Boundary
SRBRD-20 · The hypothesis audit and the minimal missing lemma
Author line in the source: Neo.K; Aletheia (GPT-5.6 Sol)
Goldbach-Shift Uniform Convolution: The Low/High Row Split, Maynard-II Fixed-Residue Dependency, Maynard-III Uniform Type-II Coverage and the Minimal Missing Lemma
Row split: Maynard-III Props 5.1–5.3 are read as supplying uniform-residue convolution for the middle and high rows (the Goldbach residue embeds in the restricted-uniform Prop 5.3), leaving GSHIFT-TII (Goldbach-shift uniformization of the Maynard-II low-row Type-II, t ∈ [1/3, 2/5]), weight factorization and the constants open.
Narrows and localises the external analytic gap to the low row and corrects the 'missing intersection' headline of SRBRD-19. Verdict: GSHIFT-TII NOT YET PROVED; CONSTANT CROSSING NOT YET PROVED; GOLDBACH STILL OPEN.
SHAPE_PASS for the middle and high rows rests on the authors' reading of external theorems plus a pending weight gate; it is not theorem-level coverage. SRBRD-21 later retracts this paper's 'possible easy outcome', and this paper partly retracts the 'missing intersection' headline of SRBRD-19 (see the download table below). The paper's own integrity firewall forbids writing 'Maynard-II can be used with a = 2m'.
Connections · Connections
This is a full-text translation of the Chinese source, which remains authoritative for its research claims. Translation is not independent mathematical verification and does not upgrade the original evidence level.