← AMRAL · PROGRAM-CCM
Computational Composite Methodology · Under construction
Unlike the other cases here, CCM doesn't target any one specific conjecture — it's a methodological theory about how the mathematical research process itself should be organized. Its core claim is methodological, not ontological: mathematical research can be represented as a continuously evolving state, in which multiple representations, search operators, certificate languages, obstructions, cost models, and path histories all interact. CCM formally separates four concepts that are often conflated — truth, method coverage, search success, and verification — and proves a core firewall theorem: as long as every final positive/negative verdict is gated by a sound verifier, and every representation transformation preserves certificate semantics, the routing process itself can be fully heuristic or even AI-generated, and the conclusion remains rigorous.
13 "calibration benchmarks" (Benchmarks 01-13) span extremal graph theory, number-theoretic semigroups, recursion, SAT/combinatorics, matrix algebra, linear-programming duality, Farkas' lemma, convexity, polynomial nonnegativity, composite routing, certificate-library expansion, cost-aware routing, and online adaptive routing — the documents explicitly state these are "empirical witnesses to the theory, not the theory itself." There is also a separate 18-round deep-application series applying CCM to the modern Hilbert's third problem (scissors congruence / Dehn invariant).
Read these three first, before any benchmark or Hilbert03 round below — the benchmarks are the theory's "empirical witnesses," not the theory itself.
Under construction, going live round by round.
From extremal graph theory to online adaptive routing, 13 independent calibration cases spanning different mathematical ecosystems.
Under construction, going live round by round.
Applies CCM's certificate-routing framework to scissors congruence / the Dehn invariant, across 18 progressively deeper rounds.