← Phase 1 / 21 · Phase 1 Next Lowest-Cost Gate

Phase 1 · 21 v0.4 · 14 2026-08-12 v0.4 Last Document

Phase 1 Next Lowest-Cost Gate

The wrap-up document for the v0.4 series, converging the 500K-scale observations accumulated in documents 18-20 into a three-stage minimum-cost execution strategy. Gate A is a delta-only base verifier: inputting the old accepted list plus two cheap fields, a3/isogeny_degrees, with the goal of precisely reproducing $40{,}749\to36{,}687$. Gate B is a twist JSON parser diff: directly materializing the old/current twists_of_ec_labels_500k.json files, calculating removed base keys, stable base keys, stable curves with twist changes, twists removed solely due to $\gcd(\cdot,3N)$, twists added solely due to the deletion of the old disc gate, and curves affected by both effects simultaneously, totaling six categories. Gate C is to rerun all the expensive Sage descents only when both A and B are completely identical to the current output of the official repository. The document encapsulates the rationale for the entire strategy into a directly quotable maxim: the full Algorithm 1 official paper runtime itself is about ten minutes, which is not actually expensive; what is truly expensive is the rework caused by semantic errors — a delta-first strategy can first confirm "we are understanding the same theorem version" before investing in full proof-engineering, rather than the other way around.

Three-stage strategy: Gate A (delta-only, cheap) → Gate B (twist JSON parser diff, six classifications) → Gate C (full Sage replay only if the two match); what is truly expensive is the rework of semantic errors, not the runtime. — The phased status self-reported by the documents in the package, reproduced as is.

Connections · Connections

Relationship with other documents, try to use the words from its own document, not my interpretation.

Phase 1 Progress21 / 25 (v0.4 Concluded)
"The full Algorithm1 current paper runtime of about ten minutes is not actually expensive in itself. What is truly expensive is the rework caused by semantic errors." — Excerpt from Section "Why?" of this document.

Loading...