← Phase 1 / 21 · Phase 1 Next Lowest-Cost Gate
The wrap-up document for the v0.4 series, converging the 500K-scale observations accumulated in documents 18-20 into a three-stage minimum-cost execution strategy. Gate A is a delta-only base verifier: inputting the old accepted list plus two cheap fields, a3/isogeny_degrees, with the goal of precisely reproducing $40{,}749\to36{,}687$. Gate B is a twist JSON parser diff: directly materializing the old/current twists_of_ec_labels_500k.json files, calculating removed base keys, stable base keys, stable curves with twist changes, twists removed solely due to $\gcd(\cdot,3N)$, twists added solely due to the deletion of the old disc gate, and curves affected by both effects simultaneously, totaling six categories. Gate C is to rerun all the expensive Sage descents only when both A and B are completely identical to the current output of the official repository. The document encapsulates the rationale for the entire strategy into a directly quotable maxim: the full Algorithm 1 official paper runtime itself is about ten minutes, which is not actually expensive; what is truly expensive is the rework caused by semantic errors — a delta-first strategy can first confirm "we are understanding the same theorem version" before investing in full proof-engineering, rather than the other way around.
Relationship with other documents, try to use the words from its own document, not my interpretation.
"The full Algorithm1 current paper runtime of about ten minutes is not actually expensive in itself. What is truly expensive is the rework caused by semantic errors." — Excerpt from Section "Why?" of this document.
Loading...