← Phase 0 / 00 · Global Bounding Consensus Verdict
BSD "speaks more humanly" than RH—the behavior of L(E,s) at s=1 corresponds to rational points, local data, and Sha, with every term clearly typed, computable, or certificable. The ruling is GO, but not treating "full BSD" as a single task; it is first split into three layers: BSD-W (weak/rank equality), BSD-F (Sha finiteness), and BSD-S (strong leading term formula), locking onto E/ℚ. Low rank (analytic rank∈{0,1}) already has the strong closure of Gross-Zagier + Kolyvagin + Modularity Theorem, and LMFDB can build a complete, finite, replayable benchmark for conductor<500,000. Four real walls are marked out first: the high-rank wall (r_an≥2 lacks a universal GZK-style bridge), the Sha wall (analytic predicted order ≠ proved finite group order), the all-prime uniform wall (a single p-part ≠ uniform control over all primes), and the all-curve quantifier wall (finite database closure ≠ ∀E/ℚ). The first mainline is Strong-BSD Twist-Family Reproduction + Certificate Atlas, using the 2024 zeta-element/Iwasawa work and the 2026 Banwait–Huang algorithmisation work as external foundations; the second mainline is the High-Rank Wall Atlas using 389.a1 (rank 2) as a sample. Stopping rules are set: if three consecutive rounds only yield numerical precision, restatements, or renaming of gaps without new theorem applicability, it is frozen.
Relationship with other documents, try to use the words from its own document, not my interpretation.
"BSD is not guaranteed to be easier to solve than RH. But it is easier to answer: exactly which typed component has been proven now?" — Excerpt from "This round's conclusion" at the end of this text.
Loading...