# Perfect Cuboid G2D.1 — Local Full-$2$-Descent Rank Theorem

## Exact local certification for the fixed slice $k=7/32$

**Status:** one exact rank theorem, two corrected/strengthened elliptic-factor bounds  
**Date:** 2026-09-30

---

# 1. Main result of this phase

For the first elliptic factor

$$
E_f:
\qquad
y^2=
(x-2)(x+2)
\left(
x+\frac{1050977}{50176}
\right),
$$

the Mordell–Weil rank is now certified exactly:

$$
\boxed{
\operatorname{rank}E_f(\mathbb Q)=1.
}
$$

This certification uses only exact integer arithmetic, full $2$-descent squareclasses, and local congruence obstructions.

No SageMath, PARI/GP, mwrank, floating-point rank estimator, or remote computation is used.

---

# 2. Integral model for $E_f$

Since

$$
50176=224^2,
$$

set

$$
x=\frac{X}{224^2},
\qquad
y=\frac{Y}{224^3}.
$$

Then

$$
E_f
$$

is $\mathbb Q$-isomorphic to

$$
\boxed{
Y^2=
(X-100352)
(X+100352)
(X+1050977).
}
$$

The three root differences are

$$
200704=448^2,
$$

$$
1151329=1073^2,
$$

$$
950625=975^2.
$$

Hence the only primes needed in the standard full-$2$-descent squareclass support are

$$
S=
\{
-1,2,3,5,7,13,29,37
\}.
$$

There are

$$
2^8=256
$$

squareclasses for each of the first two Kummer coordinates.

Thus the raw covering space contains

$$
256^2
=
\boxed{
65536
}
$$

candidate squareclass pairs.

---

# 3. Full-$2$ covering equations

Let the integral roots be

$$
e_1=100352,
$$

$$
e_2=-100352,
$$

$$
e_3=-1050977.
$$

For squareclass representatives

$$
d_1,d_2,d_3
$$

with

$$
d_1d_2d_3
\in
\mathbb Q^{\times2},
$$

a Kummer covering has the form

$$
d_1u_1^2-d_2u_2^2
=
(e_2-e_1)w^2,
$$

$$
d_1u_1^2-d_3u_3^2
=
(e_3-e_1)w^2.
$$

Every $2$-Selmer class must survive every local test.

Therefore failure of primitive solvability modulo any power

$$
p^n
$$

is a proof-safe exclusion.

---

# 4. Exact local elimination

Starting from

$$
65536
$$

candidate coverings, the exact local gates give:

$$
65536
\xrightarrow{2^4}
12288,
$$

$$
12288
\xrightarrow{3^2}
4608,
$$

$$
4608
\xrightarrow{5^2}
1152,
$$

$$
1152
\xrightarrow{7^2}
288,
$$

$$
288
\xrightarrow{13^2}
144,
$$

$$
144
\xrightarrow{29^2}
36,
$$

$$
36
\xrightarrow{37^2}
16.
$$

The final $2$-adic refinement modulo

$$
2^6=64
$$

gives

$$
\boxed{
16\rightarrow8.
}
$$

Thus

$$
\boxed{
\#\operatorname{Sel}^{(2)}(E_f/\mathbb Q)
\le8.
}
$$

---

# 5. The eight surviving squareclass triples

The surviving triples

$$
(d_1,d_2,d_3)
$$

are:

$$
(1,1,1),
$$

$$
(1,65,65),
$$

$$
(-1,-1,1),
$$

$$
(-1,-65,65),
$$

$$
(7511,7,1073),
$$

$$
(7511,455,69745),
$$

$$
(-7511,-7,1073),
$$

$$
(-7511,-455,69745).
$$

There are no additional locally admissible classes in the enumerated full squareclass support.

---

# 6. Lower bound from the known rational subgroup

The curve has full rational $2$-torsion.

G2B already certified

$$
E_f(\mathbb Q)_{\rm tors}
\cong
\mathbb Z/4\mathbb Z
\times
\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z.
$$

Therefore

$$
\dim_{\mathbf F_2}E_f(\mathbb Q)[2]=2.
$$

The seed point

$$
P=
\left(
\frac{1497}{64},
\frac{2224625}{14336}
\right)
$$

is non-torsion.

Hence

$$
\operatorname{rank}E_f(\mathbb Q)\ge1.
$$

Therefore

$$
\dim_{\mathbf F_2}
E_f(\mathbb Q)/2E_f(\mathbb Q)
\ge
2+1
=
3.
$$

So this quotient already contains at least

$$
2^3=8
$$

classes.

Since it injects into the $2$-Selmer group:

$$
8
\le
\#\operatorname{Sel}^{(2)}(E_f/\mathbb Q).
$$

Together with the local-descent upper bound:

$$
\#\operatorname{Sel}^{(2)}(E_f/\mathbb Q)
\le8,
$$

we obtain:

$$
\boxed{
\#\operatorname{Sel}^{(2)}(E_f/\mathbb Q)=8.
}
$$

Thus

$$
\dim_{\mathbf F_2}
\operatorname{Sel}^{(2)}(E_f/\mathbb Q)
=
3.
$$

Finally,

$$
3
=
\operatorname{rank}E_f(\mathbb Q)
+
\dim_{\mathbf F_2}E_f(\mathbb Q)[2],
$$

so

$$
3
=
\operatorname{rank}E_f(\mathbb Q)+2.
$$

Therefore:

$$
\boxed{
\operatorname{rank}E_f(\mathbb Q)=1.
}
$$

---

# 7. Correction to the previous $E_0$ torsion claim

The previous G2D checkpoint prematurely recorded

$$
E_0(\mathbb Q)_{\rm tors}
\cong
\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z.
$$

That statement is incorrect.

After shifting the unique rational $2$-torsion point to the origin and applying a power-of-two rational scaling, $E_0$ has the integral model

$$
\boxed{
y^2=x^3+Ax^2+Bx
}
$$

with

$$
A=-16266382031250,
$$

and

$$
B=133806763259844761394140625.
$$

Now

$$
B
=
11567487335625^2,
$$

and

$$
A+2\sqrt B
=
2620800^2.
$$

Therefore the rational point

$$
Q_0
=
\left(
11567487335625,
11567487335625\cdot2620800
\right)
$$

satisfies

$$
2Q_0=(0,0).
$$

Thus $Q_0$ has order $4$.

At the good primes

$$
11,17,19,
$$

the exact point counts are

$$
\#E_0(\mathbb F_{11})=16,
$$

$$
\#E_0(\mathbb F_{17})=24,
$$

$$
\#E_0(\mathbb F_{19})=20.
$$

Hence the rational torsion order divides

$$
\gcd(16,24,20)=4.
$$

Since an order-$4$ point exists,

$$
\boxed{
E_0(\mathbb Q)_{\rm tors}
\cong
\mathbb Z/4\mathbb Z.
}
$$

This document supersedes the torsion statement in the earlier G2D checkpoint.

The free rank of $E_0$ remains open.

---

# 8. Exact torsion of $E_-$

For the third distinct factor, use the integral root model

$$
Y^2
=
(X-e_1)(X-e_2)(X-e_3),
$$

with

$$
e_1=-8195043371142,
$$

$$
e_2=8256895726659,
$$

$$
e_3=-61852355517.
$$

The root differences are exact squares:

$$
e_2-e_1
=
4056099^2,
$$

$$
e_3-e_1
=
2851875^2,
$$

$$
e_2-e_3
=
2884224^2.
$$

Hence the curve has full rational $2$-torsion.

Moreover,

$$
Q_-
=
(
19955593808835,
81192743369781982848
)
$$

satisfies

$$
2Q_-=(e_2,0).
$$

Thus the rational torsion subgroup has at least eight elements.

At the good primes

$$
11,17,19,
$$

the exact point counts are

$$
16,\quad16,\quad24.
$$

Therefore the torsion order divides

$$
\gcd(16,16,24)=8.
$$

Consequently:

$$
\boxed{
E_-(\mathbb Q)_{\rm tors}
\cong
\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z
\times
\mathbb Z/4\mathbb Z.
}
$$

---

# 9. Full-$2$-descent upper bound for $E_-$

The bad-prime squareclass support is

$$
S_-=
\{
-1,
2,3,5,7,13,29,37,73,18521
\}.
$$

Hence the raw full-$2$ covering space has

$$
1024^2
=
1,048,576
$$

candidate squareclass pairs.

Exact local gates reduce this as follows:

$$
1048576
\xrightarrow{2^6}
131072,
$$

$$
131072
\xrightarrow{3^3}
49152,
$$

$$
49152
\xrightarrow{5^3}
12288,
$$

$$
12288
\xrightarrow{7^3}
3072,
$$

$$
3072
\xrightarrow{13^3}
1536,
$$

$$
1536
\xrightarrow{29^2}
768,
$$

$$
768
\xrightarrow{37^2}
256,
$$

$$
256
\xrightarrow{73^2}
64.
$$

At

$$
p=18521,
$$

the root difference

$$
e_2-e_1
$$

has valuation $2$, while

$$
e_3-e_1
$$

is a $p$-adic unit.

For a primitive local covering point modulo

$$
p^2,
$$

the $p$-squareclass exponent pattern

$$
(\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2,\epsilon_3)
$$

can only be

$$
(0,0,0)
$$

or

$$
(1,1,0).
$$

The patterns

$$
(0,1,1)
$$

and

$$
(1,0,1)
$$

force every projective coordinate to be divisible by $p$, contradicting primitiveness.

Therefore:

$$
64
\rightarrow
\boxed{32}.
$$

Hence

$$
\boxed{
\dim_{\mathbf F_2}
\operatorname{Sel}^{(2)}(E_-/\mathbb Q)
\le5.
}
$$

Since

$$
\dim_{\mathbf F_2}E_-(\mathbb Q)[2]=2,
$$

we obtain the proof-safe Mordell–Weil rank bound:

$$
\boxed{
\operatorname{rank}E_-(\mathbb Q)
\le3.
}
$$

No positive free-rank lower bound is claimed here.

---

# 10. Updated fixed-slice Jacobian status

The fixed-slice decomposition remains

$$
\operatorname{Jac}(C_{7/32})
\sim_{\mathbb Q}
E_f^2
\times
E_0^2
\times
E_-.
$$

We now know exactly:

$$
\boxed{
\operatorname{rank}E_f=1.
}
$$

Therefore:

$$
\boxed{
\operatorname{rank}\operatorname{Jac}(C_{7/32})
=
2
+
2\operatorname{rank}E_0
+
\operatorname{rank}E_-.
}
$$

The current rigorous bounds are:

$$
0
\le
\operatorname{rank}E_0,
$$

and

$$
0
\le
\operatorname{rank}E_-
\le3.
$$

Thus the next decisive task is no longer $E_f$.

It is:

$$
\boxed{
E_0
\text{ rank certification}
}
$$

together with a refinement of the $E_-$ descent.

---

# 11. Research consequence

This phase establishes the first exact Mordell–Weil rank theorem produced entirely inside the new Perfect Cuboid Geometry Branch:

$$
\boxed{
\operatorname{rank}E_f(\mathbb Q)=1.
}
$$

It also corrects the earlier $E_0$ torsion record and converts $E_-$ from an unclassified factor into a curve with exact torsion and a finite rank upper bound.

The rank-certification bottleneck has therefore narrowed from three elliptic curves to two.

---

**End of G2D.1**
