{
  "series": {
    "L_E": {
      "reduction_nonzero": true,
      "mu": 0,
      "lambda": 2,
      "unit_in_Lambda": false,
      "zero_mod_p_and_t": true,
      "why_mu": "some coefficient of the reduction is a unit, so the element is nonzero in Lambda",
      "why_not_unit": "the element reduces to 0 modulo (p, t), so its constant term is not a p-adic unit",
      "declared_lambda": 2,
      "declared_mu": 0
    },
    "lambda_E": {
      "reduction_nonzero": true,
      "mu": 0,
      "lambda": 0,
      "unit_in_Lambda": true,
      "zero_mod_p_and_t": false,
      "why_mu": "some coefficient of the reduction is a unit, so the element is nonzero in Lambda",
      "why_not_unit": "the element reduces to 0 modulo (p, t), so its constant term is not a p-adic unit"
    },
    "L_0": {
      "reduction_nonzero": true,
      "mu": 0,
      "lambda": 0,
      "unit_in_Lambda": true,
      "zero_mod_p_and_t": false,
      "why_mu": "some coefficient of the reduction is a unit, so the element is nonzero in Lambda",
      "why_not_unit": "the element reduces to 0 modulo (p, t), so its constant term is not a p-adic unit"
    },
    "lambda_0": {
      "reduction_nonzero": true,
      "mu": 0,
      "lambda": 0,
      "unit_in_Lambda": true,
      "zero_mod_p_and_t": false,
      "why_mu": "some coefficient of the reduction is a unit, so the element is nonzero in Lambda",
      "why_not_unit": "the element reduces to 0 modulo (p, t), so its constant term is not a p-adic unit"
    }
  },
  "weierstrass_split": {
    "m": 2,
    "u_first_coefficients": [
      2,
      2,
      2,
      0,
      5
    ],
    "u_is_a_unit": true,
    "u_times_u_inverse": [
      1,
      0,
      0,
      0
    ],
    "split_reassembles_exactly": true
  },
  "non_zero_divisor": {
    "order_additive_on_every_trial": true,
    "trials": 40,
    "sample": [
      {
        "ord_g": 4,
        "ord_product": 6,
        "expected": 6,
        "nonzero": true
      },
      {
        "ord_g": 7,
        "ord_product": 9,
        "expected": 9,
        "nonzero": true
      },
      {
        "ord_g": 3,
        "ord_product": 5,
        "expected": 5,
        "nonzero": true
      }
    ]
  },
  "layers": [
    {
      "layer": "D-NV1 — the class is nonzero",
      "object": "X^n kappa-hat_d mod X in Q",
      "status": "PASS",
      "by": "LR's assertion in C1.13's construction (well-defined and nonzero mod X), lifted to classes by Prop C1.1",
      "label": "CITED_THEOREM"
    },
    {
      "layer": "D-NV2 — the map is nonzero",
      "object": "lambda_rec : Q -> A_p, the composite of loc_11 with the Perrin-Riou regulator for F^- V(g)^*",
      "status": "PASS",
      "by": [
        "Prop C1.1 as stated: the Greenberg Selmer group — BY DEFINITION the kernel of loc_p into H^1(Q_p, F^- V(g)^*(chi)(n) (x) H_Gamma(-j)) — VANISHES. So the FIRST factor, loc_p, is injective on Q.",
        "Prop C1.1's proof: Q is free of rank 1 over H_Gamma, and the regulator carries Kato's canonical element to L_p(g x psi), which is NOT a zero-divisor. So the SECOND factor is nonzero on Q.",
        "H_Gamma is a domain (for Gamma = Z_11 it is a ring of functions analytic on the open unit disc), so multiplication by a nonzero element is injective; an injection followed by that is injective."
      ],
      "why_the_two_steps_are_not_the_same_kernel": "the vanishing Greenberg Selmer group is the kernel of loc_p, not of the composite; the composite's injectivity needs the second factor's nonvanishing as well, and that is what the non-zero-divisor clause supplies",
      "strength": "injective, not merely nonzero",
      "surjective": false,
      "label": "CITED_THEOREM",
      "rank_one_argument": "a nonzero map of free rank-one modules over a domain is injective; a nonzero map of one-dimensional spaces over a field is an isomorphism"
    },
    {
      "layer": "D-NV3 — the image is nonzero",
      "object": "lambda_rec(z-bar) = (nonzero scalar) * L_p(g_E x psi)",
      "status": "PASS",
      "scalars": {
        "C = c^*_f(r)": "in L^x (C1.13)",
        "C_d": {
          "value": 26,
          "mod_p": 4,
          "unit": true
        },
        "L_p(g x tau)": "unit (RUN-098)",
        "1/L_p(Ad g)": "fractional, cleared (RUN-098)",
        "log^{[r+1]}": "non-zero-divisor, non-unit (RUN-098)"
      },
      "series_nonvanishing": {
        "mu": 0,
        "reduction_nonzero": true,
        "why": "some coefficient of the reduction is a unit, so the element is nonzero in Lambda",
        "label": "COMPUTED_HERE"
      },
      "and_not_a_unit": {
        "unit_in_Lambda": false,
        "why": "the element reduces to 0 modulo (p, t), so its constant term is not a p-adic unit",
        "label": "COMPUTED_HERE"
      },
      "what_is_NOT_claimed": [
        "the order of vanishing at t = 0 over Z_11",
        "the leading coefficient",
        "any leading-term equality"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "declared_layers": [
    "D-NV1",
    "D-NV2",
    "D-NV3"
  ],
  "annihilation": {
    "what_vanishes": "the VALUE of L_E at the central point is not a unit (L_E = 0 mod (11, t))",
    "what_does_not_vanish": "L_E itself: mu = 0, so L_E != 0 in Lambda",
    "the_map": "multiplication by L_E on a free rank-one H_Gamma-module",
    "kernel": 0,
    "kernel_witness": "ord(L_E * g) = ord(L_E) + ord(g) for every nonzero g tested, so no nonzero g is killed",
    "correct_form": "L_E = t^2 * u with u(0) = 2 != 0 — a nonzero map vanishing to positive order",
    "D_needs_only": "u != 0, equivalently L_E != 0",
    "exact_m_belongs_to": "E",
    "forbidden_inference": "L_E(0) = L_E'(0) = 0, therefore the reciprocity map annihilates the target",
    "forbidden_inference_taken": false
  },
  "directional": {
    "relevant_tangent_directions": 1,
    "why": "PC-001 fixes one weight/cyclotomic direction; after the weight specialisation exactly the cyclotomic direction remains",
    "round_011_statement_used": "(17.1) one variable: the order is e + m exactly, with no direction to choose",
    "round_030_warning_not_needed": "the multivariable requirement tau_m(xi^{(x)m}) != 0 needs a direction; with one direction there is nothing to choose",
    "forbidden_inference": "one variable, therefore every derivative is nonzero",
    "forbidden_inference_taken": false,
    "counterexample_from_the_tree": {
      "series": "the tree's own L_E mod 11",
      "nonzero_as_a_series": true,
      "value_at_0": 0,
      "first_derivative_at_0": 0,
      "first_nonzero_taylor_coefficient_index": 2,
      "its_value": 2,
      "so_one_variable_does_not_imply_a_nonzero_derivative": true
    }
  },
  "mod_p_data_does_not_determine": "the order of vanishing at t = 0 over Z_11; only lambda and mu are determined",
  "lambda_matches_declared": true,
  "mu_matches_declared": true,
  "agrees": true
}
